So, this has been an expensive few months.  This month I wound up with an xbox 360 arcade edition which I wanted to use as a media extender.  Since I got it for about $100 new through some special, I figured it'd be a better investment than anything else.  I already run playon media server in my house, so this was the best route to go.  I may even try a game or two on it :).  However, during my research I discovered that the xbox not only does not come with wifi built in (eh?), but you need to use microsofts wifi adapter which sells for about $80 (talk about a huge markup!).

Of course, anyone looking this up on the internet can find a few alternate options.  The one I went with was using DD-WRT on a cheap router.  I picked up a new draft-n router Airlink AR670W on meritline for about $30, and decided to make my current buffalo WHR-G54s router into an xbox router.  Since the buffalo was already running dd-wrt, all I needed to do was put a different dd-wrt bin on it when it came (i didn't need to, but I was using a special vpn bin that was probably overkill for this).  I found a pretty good website that explained how to configure the xbox router after you put dd-wrt on it.  There were a couple typos in that (line 15 and line 17 should be  192.168.2.1) and since I use MAC security, I had to use the routers WAN MAC address (the one printed on the outside of the router is the LAN MAC address), but other than that, everything went great.

Configuring the AR670w however was kind of a bitch.  Apparently the bin they mention on the dd-wrt forums and all over the internet doesn't work properly (lan ports don't work on some versions), so you are supposed to use a different bin (mentioned a few times in this thread, I've linked to one of the pages with a d/l of the correct bin).  Hopefully they'll get that fixed by the time anyone else stumbles across this.  :)  Obviously I could have just used the AR670w as a xbox router, but the 802.11n (albiet draft) was going to be put to better use as a main router and my G router as the xbox connector.

On the media-pc project from a couple months ago, I'm waiting for a new version of Boxee that will come out in december...  Right now I'm still using my PS3 with Playon for hulu, since hulu dies half-way through shows on the Mac Mini I used for the living room Media PC.  I picked up a mac since I knew it did netflix, didn't know about the hulu issue - the pc version appears to do hulu fine, but no netflix...  apparently theres some kind of comedian working over at boxee :)

Not being into the "social" online setting, I've managed to avoid having a facebook profile all these years.  However, more and more people have been creating facebook profiles and doing their emails and events through it that I've started to get left out of the family and friend loop.  No big deal, I have lots of other things to do.  However, in order to eliminate the Hermit label, I decided to set up a Facebook profile.  Sure, I've used the other social sites out there in the past, more as a techie geek to see how they work and less to actually set up anything I use.  Since my intent was to use Facebook, I have a very strict set of requirements.  I have different groups of "friends".  I have family, i have close friends and I have work friends.  Each one has a certain criteria I want to configure and restrict from different items.  My family I want to share those family photos with.  My close friends I am willing to share tagged photos with and maybe a different set of photos.  My work buddies, well, they just get the basics in case they need to contact me. Everyone else?  I don't want to share anything with them, they need to add me.

So, It appears that Facebook has these options.  In an effort to document all the settings I did in case the "cloud" goes down and I have to re set up a profile, or more likely, someone else wants to know how to do this, I've created this post.

1. First things first, we need groups.  To set up groups, you need to create lists.  From your home page, after being logged in, you'll see on the left hand tab the "create" button.  Click on create, then create the groups you want to use.  I created three: Family, Buddies, and Work.  As an fyi, you can have people in more than one list.  In case, for instance, you have family who you like enough to be buddies with.  :)   By the way, I originally called my buddies list, friends, but do to the confusion of them using the term 'friends' in other places for your global friend list, i switched to the term 'buddies'.
2. Next, you need to categorize your "friends".  Click on Friends at the top, then under the lists tab, click on Friends.  This will bring up all your friends. Next to each friend you'll see a dropdown.  Go through each dropdown and categorize your friends.
3. Now for your privacy settings.  I've done them with images to help out...  Privacy Settings, Privacy Search and Privacy Applications
   

   Facebook Privacy Profile

   

   Facebook Privacy Search

   

   Facebook Privacy Applications

   As an aside, for applications settings, you can click on the Applications hyperlink on the Application Privacy section "Applications Authorized to access your Information" and customize which groups can see which applications.  As mentioned, i've set it up so family can see Flickr, but no one else.  I've also set up Google Latitude box on my facebook page and restricted it so only Family can see my location in case I'm abducted, but not Work or Buddies since they're the ones most likely to have abducted me.  You'll also notice on the Privacy Settings section is where I restricted the 'tagged photo' feature to buddies only as well as how I've set it so that 'only friends and friends of friends can see anything (vs. everyone). This way NO information shows up to the general public.  The reason I set 'friends of friends' vs. just friends is that seems like it would be the most appropriate setting to allow friends who I have not found yet to contact me (since they'll most likely have linked to other friends of mine).

4. Finally, under Privacy - Profile - Contact Information is where you can restrict what contact information people see about you as well as which emails show up.

Hopefully that'll help lock down your profile.  One final suggestion is that you should not link your work email address, if you have one, to your facebook profile.  The reason is someone technical to explain, but it involves applications such as xobni (previously mentioned) and their ability to announce the existence of your profile without anyone searching.  If anyone has any additional ideas that I may have missed or any corrections, please leave a comment below.

So, apparently Google decided to expand into the OS market or at least show the intent to do so by posting about their upcoming Google Chrome OS.  I'm not entirely sure why this is new or exciting.  Cursory review of their plans show that they are creating a minimalistic version of another Linux Distro essentially with a Chrome Browser front end.  While I do think the concept is intriguing as far as size and speed goes, who prey-tell would actually want a 1+ ghz processor pc running this, I don't know.  The netbook internet cafe pc is a proof of concept idea without the back end infrastructure out there to support it.   We don't always have Wifi internet, sometimes I'm actually at places without internet, and I need to work.  Maybe in 10 years with technologies such as WiMax expanding over cities, this might change.  As of now, most people want a desktop based OS with Cloud Synchronization.

How this does effect us is how it expands Chrome to another platform.  With a Windows, Android and it's own OS version, developers should consider getting on the ball and making extensions that will work with it.  Password managers, Bookmarks Sync (real bookmark sync, not that lousy google bookmark label system) and other tools people use.

So I haven't posted in a while.  Not because there hasn't been anything to post about, but because there has been too much.  With all the news that's come out lately, Palm Pre ~ Project Natal ~ iPhone 3GS ~ Bing.com ~ Google Wave, I've been inundated with keeping up on everything.  Plus, with news of this scale, there are much more qualified people (see my technology links on the side) who can write on these topics.  I prefer to write about either lesser known technologies, personal views, or ways to use existing technologies in a different way.  Just posting for the sake of posting is a waste of everyone's time.

Today, however, I visited the finally opened GDGT site which I must say was worth the wait.  The site looks great and I can see a lot of great uses for it.  For a quick review of the site, I'd suggest being lazy and watching the video they produced.  This is more than just an engadget or gizmodo blog remake, this site also allows you to link the gadgets you have, had, or want to your profile and follow the discussions on those gadgets.  It's still working out the bugs but I've traversed the site and have seen some good community feedback which will make the site better.  I've suggested one idea myself which would be to allow us to link our gadgets between each other to create relationships between the gadgets for use as a research tool (which headsets work with which phones, etc).  I'd also love to see a way to print out my 'have' list in case of an emergency.  Ya never know when you need to send a list off to your home or auto insurance carrier.  Ha!  Anyway, I'd suggest taking a look at the site.  I can see this idea they have used on other niche's as well.

You may be aware of Google Latitude which provides your location to a limited set of contacts, which is great for keeping in touch with Friends and Family.  However, what do you do when you want to share your location temporarily with Customers or Coworkers?  Glympse solves that problem, at least for G1 Owners anyway.  Glympse is a great tool to add to your business arsenal if you are in a customer oriented business or even on a limited basis for other lifestyle actions.  Basically, with Glympse, you provide your location to a recipient of your choosing on a limited basis.  Going to meet a client for lunch?  Send him a glympse when you're on your way.  From his desktop (if he's meeting you at his place) or his G1 (should he have one), he can see how far away you are and know when to expect you.   He, or she, can watch your location on your route.  Sure, this can be done with Latitude, but what this does is allow you to temporarily add a person, set it for an hour (or the time of your choosing) and during that time they can monitor your location via the link your device sends out. Afterward, the 'location' expires and they can no longer track your position unless you send them another invite.   This is a great tool for arranging meetings with people, they can come down to meet you when you're close without you having to text or call (while driving).  Visit glympse.com for some other great uses.  They also suggest using it for your family so they can know when you're on your way home.  I'm not so sure about that use, I still think you'd use something like latitude for that, or maybe an 'always on' location system. I for one wouldn't want to have to send my location home every day.  But, maybe that's just me.  According to the site, they're making apps for the iPhone as well as the Blackberry, which should increase it's business functionality.

Here is a great plug-in that will help you to improve your email efficiency with no work on your part.  After a simple install, Xobni adds a handful of amazing features to outlook.  Xobni's handful of features include an email search functionality which is nothing new, but is not only incredibly fast and accurate, it is almost required for those of us using Outlook 2007 which is known to have inaccurate and in-concise search results or just stops working altogether.  Other functionality of Xobni is relating to attachments.  Click on a persons name and it will show in the Xobni panel all of the files you have exchanged between that person, in date order for revision tracking.  I have already saved tons of time with this feature alone, as I am always sorting by attachments to hunt down the attachment that was sent by a specific user.  Xobni has built in analytics, while not necessarily an efficiency saver like the rest of the features, sure is interesting to read.  Ever wonder how long it takes someone to respond, this'll tell you.  I can see a use for this, if you've ever tried to convince someone that so-and-so never replies to you or takes forever, now you have the statistics to prove it.  For the sales types, you can also click on a person and find out their Linkedin, facebook or Hoover company results quickly.  If you're interested, watch the video below and check Xobni out directly!
 

It seems I've been getting links from everywhere the last few months for various Cloud Computing Desktops that have sprung up.  I've been trying most of them, not out of necessity but out of intrigue.  What do I plan on using them for?  Honestly, I don't know, but they sure are neat to try.  The three I've tried as of late are g.ho.st, startforce and most recently, iCloud.  The advertising associated with the cloud computing desktop environment is "take your desktop everywhere you go", but what about those of us who only go places where they have a desktop?  I can see the use one day of a desktop type environment where many of our office apps are run from a desktop, but as john c. dvorak points out on numerous occasions, what happens when the "cloud" goes down either because of network issues or the site itself shuts down completely.  Data portability my friends... and none of these sites have it yet.  Until they do, i'll continue to run my own version of cloud computing which involves local applications with local data synced over the internet via Live Mesh, xMarks, Lastpass, and finally backed up with services like Mozy.  I will say that the Cloud Desktops are definitely a marvel in web programming and so I thought I'd do a quick rundown of my experiences.

Of the three, Startforce appears to function the best and has the cleanest interface, in my opinion.  Startforce ran perfectly in Firefox 3.1 beta as well as IE 8 64-bit.  It has an impressive MS style Word & Excel apps, mail worked great and IM was a breeze to set up (to note, these type of app testings are the only time my "IM" buddies ever see me on anymore).  Of the three I think it has the least amount of apps, but the apps it does have are pretty well polished.  Most of the apps seem to pre-launch with a quick command line prompt that oddly resembles a citrix app and lessens the desktop experience a tad.  Startforce even went all the way and included various backgrounds as well as a screen saver.  I'm thinking the screen saver is just a gimmick, i can't see the real use of it in a cloud desktop.  The fact that they built in a Screen Saver but didn't include the most critical app of all office computing, solitaire, is beyond me.

iCloud has a nice start interface and seems the most like a 'true pc' by including such things as a "Command Prompt'.  I didn't have much luck getting my mail working, so I can't comment on that.  Some windows would not pop up or popped up a little slow.  The feature set, while larger than startforce, i don't think has been fully tested.  One intriguing feature that might save it is a 'development platform', however I have to be honest in that I didn't use it so i don't know how well it works.  I'd be interested in someones experience with that who has actually programming experience.

g.ho.st is a Cloud Desktop i've tried on and off since i first stumbled upon it about 6 months or so back.  Of development cycles, it is the farthest along.  g.ho.st requires flash and thus does not work in the 64-bit IE 8 but does work great in Firefox and i imagine, but didn't test, IE 32-bit.  g.ho.st has a ton of apps including functionality for Pandora & last.fm so you should be able to do just about everything in it that you would do in a standard desktop (short of true gaming).  Most of the 3rd party style apps appear to be browser based, so I don't know if that counts as a true application and may affect your usability in an internet cafe style environment.  For the record, they use the much praised Zoho office apps.

If you have more to add regarding these Cloud Computing Desktops or any others you have tried, please leave a comment below.

Windows 7, the new proposed entry edition slated as the 'perfect OS for Netbooks', is anything but.  Windows 7 Starter Edition, part of the new line-up of Windows 7 OS's, boasts a 3 application limit that is surely to aggravate and confuse the average consumer who attempts to run this pseudo OS.  What is Microsoft telling consumers?  Basically, The Windows 7 Starter Edition can run 3 applications and numerous instances of those applications.  The 3 application limit does not include services such as Anti-virus applications, nor does it encompass windows included applications such as Notepad, Command Prompt and presumably Paint.  All this will do is cause the market to attempt to circumvent the limit by building more cloud applications, as pointed out in the GDGT podcast.  The average consumer will be even more confused as to why some apps (windows apps) aren't affected by the 3 application limit and others are.  What is an app?  Try to explain this to your grandma who just bought a $200 Netbook initially only to view pictures and read your emails that she has to shut down something if she wants to run skype to talk to her grandkid?

So, rather than blast Microsoft, I thought I'd suggest an alternative.  Scrap the Windows 7 Starter Edition, or make it what it truly is, a free product for people to test the new Microsoft OS or as a minimalistic alternative to Linux.  Heck, Give it the "Express" name and put it with their other free Express products lineup.  Create the Windows 7 Netbook Edition.  Windows 7 Netbook Edition could encompass the physical limits of a Netbook without confusing the consumer at a later stage.  Some limitations could be:

• Limit the Screen Resolution.  Netbooks typically have a limited screen size or resolution.  Use that.  Don't offer resolutions greater than would (or should) be found on a 10" Netbook.  Limit it to a single display.
• Limit the UI Settings.  To give the best Windows experience, limit the UI settings.  Don't offer aero glass features or any other UI features that would slow the processor.
• Limit many of the services that should never come into play in a consumer Netbook environment to keep the Netbook edition from being ported to (and competing with) the higher price-point editions.  Routing and Remote Access, Fax Service, Group Policies, Task Scheduler, etc. are not essential in a Netbook experience.
• Remove many of the applications that are not essential in a Netbook environment.  Remote Desktop, Task Scheduler, Import portion of Windows Easy Transfer, limited System Restore functionality, etc.

The advantage of some of these limitations is it would allow Microsoft to sell a cheaper version of their OS without risking it diluting their full fledged OS consumer and business market. It will also limit any PR issues as the users experience will typically not change through the life of that particular product.  The product will still perform as would be expected in a Windows 7 experience but within the confines of a netbook.  I specifically left out cpu requirements since those can change in the future.  It is unlikely however that the physical and usage requirements for a netbook will change however (small, light and streamlined).

Since Microsoft is planning on making a Basic Edition as an low-grade inexpensive (read: lousy) alternative for the Desktop and Laptop Computing environment, a case could be made that the Netbook Edition could offer the limited functionality of the Basic Edition within the hardware confines of a Netbook and at a cheaper price-point.  A case could also be made that the Netbook edition should be for sale to the public for those who buy one of the Linux netbooks on price-point alone and decide later that they'd prefer the windows experience.

In short, simple is better.  Make your OS lineup easily understandable by the consumer.  Don't surprise them with weird tech lingo or variable limitations.  Let the consumer buy the OS based on the features and product they own with the expectations that they'll continue to have the same experience when they purchased the product throughout the life of the product.  So, in closings, I'd suggest this:

1. Windows Netbook Edition - Streamlined Netbook edition
2. Windows Basic Edition - Entry level desktop & laptop edition (needs a better name than "Basic" !)
3. Windows Premium Edition - Full version of the Windows 7 experience
4. Windows Profession Edition - Enterprise version (group policy and other functionality needed for enterprise)

Agree, Dis-agree, thoughts?